From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mingde (Matthew) Zeng" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Implicit assumptions in the latest discussions Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:31:29 -0400 Message-ID: <87ft7gp5da.fsf@posteo.net> References: <1bc3251a-7b36-f151-7fc6-9ecf2639bb9f@grinta.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniele Nicolodi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 17 21:33:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzeX-0002jD-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:33:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40786 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzeW-00087l-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzd2-0007Is-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:54793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzd0-0002nn-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B237E2400FD for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:31:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1600371090; bh=zxgMUz1BoStJIw8pBJ3PPZQZPzYDbDluRcyxjVbxDNg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=KoWgq2MufQiQi6Y2+/MQKwISHRpY2oSq7ZjO+wtC0s00njeA5jEReMFibkrOqbTaI JZRamsl2UjQerYLP3BxTCSx258RhpZ4Pb1TXc2FRnci4RpISO2rrZBIlKbYsD0ABoI cphzPVsGnS6lPMXso6StN4UTdDKl0oY3CG6VwRLz8iNwydgb3oPS66D5j4QT2CCCmN eoJoVUiHy5rH7WVKYApaaTFHj8JOcgBzF7eWBjQ7E/B56/V3bLI4Y7t16BrT0+XIt3 r/6oUezoAVOr3Oz7OQN24ORBUJq3IOvuGsqbkId5EvEarpCs2J5E6VaXzDS3zEwzNp duX7JS553Gl1Q== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BsnC55L2Yz9rxB; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:31:29 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <1bc3251a-7b36-f151-7fc6-9ecf2639bb9f@grinta.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=matthewzmd@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/17 15:08:59 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256027 Archived-At: > I don't think there can be any correlation between the number of users > of Emacs and the number of hackers interesting in working on it. I don't see why there isn't an correlation. Cheers, Matthew -- Mingde (Matthew) Zeng