From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Don't add tags to ELPA packages -- documentation? Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:10:22 -0700 Message-ID: <87fsv7bww1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:HnxA/+n5EPZgUkiXYd37SVE5QP0= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 17 23:11:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mG6NI-0008Kh-HT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:11:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mG6NG-0007NB-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mG6Lx-0006Yd-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:40696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mG6Lu-0003sV-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mG6Lr-0006Vm-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:10:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272521 Archived-At: I just realized that you can't realistically add tags to your ELPA packages, because tag names need to be unique across a repo, and your "v0.6" is going to conflict with other packages' attempts to tag the same. EBDB occupied some prime tag real estate with its earlier point versions, but now I can't tag 0.7 because eglot already has that. Can I patch the README to tell developers not to use tags at all? (You can't even tag locally and not push them; git still complains.) Or is there any other trick to solve the situation?