From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs master: different (ugly) font in org-mode [Windows, macOS] Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:06:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87fsm8z6ku.fsf@localhost> References: <1758826875.387473.1633124447794@mail1.libero.it> <87a6jsqbhq.fsf@protesilaos.com> <1048176278.452440.1633374684696@mail1.libero.it> <87sfxgr320.fsf@protesilaos.com> <83sfxf4rs2.fsf@gnu.org> <1638550012.538.1633441275953@mail1.libero.it> <83a6jn4gpq.fsf@gnu.org> <1553192207.19756.1633463102315@mail1.libero.it> <83r1cy2x2q.fsf@gnu.org> <1296031966.62064.1633554406095@mail1.libero.it> <87a6jlv4qz.fsf@protesilaos.com> <874k9txwik.fsf@localhost> <877depv31n.fsf@protesilaos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6931"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Angelo Graziosi , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Protesilaos Stavrou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 07:06:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nh2YH-0001Z1-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:06:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nh2YF-0006PP-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nh2Xa-0005h9-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]:46885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nh2XW-0006Ky-Oe; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id e62-20020a17090a6fc400b001d2cd8e9b0aso905450pjk.5; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:06:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=Yrg1BOUizWN5W/MeO0rfzBNwyq86dNZFvCoqqxKs+CY=; b=AwJFrLFjUa5XPDBnH5NuI+r9Mwr3o9JTh6YillBX2VRjwh96Hi5N33Bd0orCqll3Sl f9o1gMHcsxjhMGAimeiZHUhNqDOR5aafdF72jhr90LK5npMgMdNqwgXZlHhoDbstM6dh U3VpRjUWDPqxiVI5t92Of7JNDMPSn23uLtbGL1Z0jccG92AEbwOM3owmlBgRDfVm06B7 9MrhN+Ofln9J2v42ccCONuBdyOfb+9h+TkfihTOrn7xoUrJ56XYM8qAOV4AlH1asN3y3 NHjWcd2NOS6FjkDBwQ1PaSr9pcfnCzSA75s8rhe+DfBSWya3yE/3QAatrSUEXOxMhAs/ M3HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=Yrg1BOUizWN5W/MeO0rfzBNwyq86dNZFvCoqqxKs+CY=; b=owBqwC+jMVTGG+DwMO7x7zsLCEltdkj+vSFRwuDGfSrk9Ynwj2HauTgJ28W97+cBJ2 Dncdwn/5uIciZORBEhuSFlEdYln4oSk/xH6/4L0qDCFtmm1jNwJaXz6fXIRrDS355ld5 /qW52+vunmc16ZzvyNRroJPvTb7cV0L1WSbRhpXV3OSPcf/pFc4wvDhkV7vVvAWHUDi+ t/1MmlF+2JamJzwTf6I0sG2LhICMRX/rELJB6DI6FgAHmjRJFQZhei88UJwoZalxTtEG P7C71Ctasw/WtOb9l7pp6N7uQYs9YVGQXE/S2XFs11VapVr+qtKgHslY7Uhp+hPc2c/B XS3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gd+p4OJO44evVQ1Sj4QtbPsYhEX8XK3xR25Oyx7Wsyl39GkcY cNoKZUd5AIodKAqzi6liLeQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkghUR+wLTglHtUxqKD2LMtZ2F6q6FObmH6Fq5hLm2N3rIop0LWbT/0roq60W3Ynxtl7QYJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bf85:b0:1ca:8a8e:bec3 with SMTP id d5-20020a17090abf8500b001ca8a8ebec3mr2359386pjs.127.1650431165163; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([64.32.23.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay33-20020a056a00302100b00508374700b9sm17268979pfb.166.2022.04.19.22.06.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:06:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877depv31n.fsf@protesilaos.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1029.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288692 Archived-At: Protesilaos Stavrou writes: >> Given the raised concern, you can request reverting the patch in Org ML. >> That should go to bugfix (=stable) branch. Then, Emacs devs can merge the latest >> bugfix any time they prefer. > > Thank you, Ihor! If others have no objections or better ideas, I will > prepare that patch later today. Bastien has reverted the problematic commit in 8aff825682. The problem should be fixed in Org 9.5.3 Best, Ihor