From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: what is the most efficient way to bisect Emacs master? Make clean always? Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:55:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87fsfu6y9a.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <87czayfgi3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35064"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 11 19:57:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oiJVF-0008wq-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:57:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiJVD-0000rX-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiJTb-0008Ju-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiJTZ-0000Dx-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768645C010B for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:55:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1665510931; x=1665597331; bh=ulL0btMHfP y6VeMYxGxabpt7jleQ9O5iXzHKxM0uloo=; b=fjm64TW1EE4IFx4rrcaso4fk7a v06uDG7RZrCHQT9rXgzH/OkJ5noss+G8F4rAb1h2E1S+NAjpTVACdBpE7keJbzlz Kh4BOyLjEU63D3uG8+52tJ5kRF5tffj9p7vCU+sBqcq/Nnq3uk2wdo5NbCH7kW3D eyV6g0PNZcbJiLn6LN3w5yCpvCBJpqyhsRN7VmVxZvpE3bu5ia+fK3btY5R2HXav gIlsOCrvLTD6NtoChaeoiMRPps2v1Y6Zf4mK7jyb2TIH7QObrkCnXUyZ18YRs+ns m+41K+b2SFR33+aErprkeIVFFBVsxOXMWOYIu1FGpTB9bVmqLyx1sjDpSPiw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1665510931; x=1665597331; bh=ulL0btMHfPy6VeMYxGxabpt7jleQ 9O5iXzHKxM0uloo=; b=RD7shUufe6IHFGG3ryaLpQjHgPuO9eKXj88YJ1j+zKrx Lm6z11GLHcv+unNP6j38LxPjXQZY2biwVvks3Y9LEo8kNjGRGbJ1fEzq8ikMT7G8 1Ms2Syf7dGLlAgFVCEAUNowOT52+XXK3m3pgHSimNMOIGhW9M05lV0dSzUMpoFVZ +q75gZ+xACSLSMsfhZbSDakjtd5B4y7j/xwJNnMAud74WF5Uq25tuaD0Wfl9nYfB vRjJOam9iWrdN9WHMQAjL1MAkSrahqc6HqY/EuE/5piZvtKhalESZI7k6iVJSx66 axcHKbEwyiOrqorbQDTnhkcYUBRUOZ8sm66ELRCjHw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeejiedguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttd dttddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhn sehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffeutedtfedvtd etvefgueefjefggedugfefuddtgeefteekheduvdefjeejieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfi hhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i23c04076:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0366A7F439A; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:55:29 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: <87czayfgi3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:54:12 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297516 Archived-At: Hello, On Tue 11 Oct 2022 at 06:54PM +02, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Hi > > I am currently bisecting emacs master in order to find the commit that > causes BUG 58412: 29.0.50 > > Question, is it necessary to run > > make clean > > For each new commit in the bisection session? Wouldn't it be highly dependent on the kind of bug you are trying to find? I typically start with just 'make', then resort to a full 'git clean -xdff' if that doesn't work. There are possible steps in between. -- Sean Whitton