From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type declarations in Elisp Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 22:42:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87fs466eh6.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87il984vxv.fsf@localhost> <03fc79f4-a532-71b1-0de9-8e52bdf3f138@gmail.com> <87msykfwym.fsf@localhost> <83lee3tjla.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxm7iu2.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1355"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:jd8JCQ9/FdFF/28ltKmggVLEEUA= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 26 07:14:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZld3-0000AZ-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:14:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlcB-0001kG-38; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:13:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZddl-0005uh-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZddj-0004ZW-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZddg-0008fE-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 22:42:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:13:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309227 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo wrote: >> FWIW here are the results before I lost interest in the >> idea, for now at least. >> >> I was unable to get `elisp-benchmarks-run' to just run >> specific benchmarks, but reading the docstring it claims >> that it is possible, so maybe the error was on me. > > From the docstring of `elisp-benchmarks-run'. > > If non nil SELECTOR is a regexp to match the benchmark > names to be executed. The test is repeated RUNS number > of times. > > emacs -batch -l ./elisp-benchmarks.el -eval > '(elisp-benchmarks-run "bubble")' > > This for instance on my system runs only bubble and > bubble-no-cons. Indeed, that works here as well. What I did was just evaluating, in this case (elisp-benchmarks-run "bubble") i.e., without running it batch-mode. That produces the entire table, I'm not sure how that happens even but it does say in the _package_ documentation to run it batch-mode and that makes more sense, also. Still I wonder why that happens? :O >> Also it would be beneficial if it could just be told to >> just return the values, now it can only make a table out if >> it - granted, it is neat and all. > > The values in which format? They would be in the same format, what I had in mind was so you would get for example the above form to evaluate into (0.80 0.09 1 0.89 0.01) instead of | test | non-gc avg (s) | gc avg (s) | gcs avg | tot avg (s) | tot avg err (s) | |----------------+----------------+------------+---------+-------------+-----------------| | bubble | 0.80 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.89 | 0.01 | | bubble-no-cons | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0 | 1.06 | 0.00 | |----------------+----------------+------------+---------+-------------+-----------------| | total | 1.86 | 0.09 | 1 | 1.95 | 0.01 | And, while we are at it, maybe the documentation could also explain these columns. It only has to be one sentence for each, i.e. non-gc avg (s), gc avg (s), gcs avg, tot avg (s), and tot avg err (s). Sorry about giving you more work but these should be quick fixes :) -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal