From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14192: 24.3.50; recursive edit while running ispell not working usefully Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87fryxkrqh.fsf@web.de> References: <87hajbkd3v.fsf@web.de> <87ppxzd75p.fsf@web.de> <87mstc5zpt.fsf@web.de> <83o7drj8r7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ikln9b.fsf@web.de> <83h6jgfmwi.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34183"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 14192@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 16 20:23:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1q-0008fQ-RX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:23:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1b-0001yH-FM; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1Z-0001xx-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1Z-0007Xm-Eu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1Z-0000Yy-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14192 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14192-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14192.17054329682145 (code B ref 14192); Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14192) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2024 19:22:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49797 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1M-0000YW-3I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:37159) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPp1J-0000YI-Vn for 14192@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1705432958; x=1706037758; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=XS18Sn6jjGM0Vp2EvkEdEsps0hVvu98y0+n8qrXQzFs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=q0SYRRgHplFi9GJdwWluI5K538jqwKc4vruLrm7kcSjyIILCqLvE5/9AmfVn5uUU M/z4K5QEGAl+UuhAyblL6gz+QMyQf6QjD2+Hc4Jl3DbZg2/GxM1bicsxi21/0hMy9 OflvJ9dX5pvZYDfiZ4qX+VcJhbQ8H3Yxs9oCuCoRUwx39tQxEBPX6qjL/yPwspv2s NVPD3tOvL+G//hY975xVXxPof/a5IvJnlNtH29NH7I+5kibgRUgRGOXAWpbrLD0aG 74MNutzGBypde5ZBGVpL4AhYLD78gOjlbczUnISuMyBYUQjLDIvhdxZqPsR5gvnjV kY8bxAgl/RrM++rUlg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([178.6.28.230]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQxnv-1rkLs11vpX-00O3My; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:22:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83h6jgfmwi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 14 Jan 2024 08:29:33 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Wep/NcWnVrfG0M8CPVuk5r65I8exja4umMzQ1c1HRNSYchrnRrS AoN1qa8daMvXZhozItObFBg3dNRDSmgiZueJCkRS6DsbG35qIRsmyJPNQ/+oFAYdg/RGwec nb34KZRImWdO97F+TAT+1/kL35b6dBuM/5IK6fVJEA/C6pxskVt8sVdFNLKHT1bq4dAjv4Y Vej+K3yRlvleI+KvrGorA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:zxD0YzgpzuE=;HZU7PcKwIbIVcQoSFHHy3ElU1I0 c5vOXGflRB45+mnifZ3d8QGmjBfVyIll+RIxusCOZOy/EvgALhEh3ECLsDOUGqDL7CxjFKbW9 KGc52jM7S2/uPF8PUb2fmzMqqnFfF4oGmlcTixaeO5NIXFBqGOdsXtlyYcAKkY6vq+00aYR+l JQHqxmflGR9t0NS4IxYzK22E6iyO9yVp+UASU6UJ5BjShcTt5LYALRXXeauFQ0xnB8eUA0nuY lDmW65uaLw+qQYNPH5tpf1n7E9ZyMaivVyv3WoypsvILuTi7hYen2PbuBuuImxA/9Oij63Mib yVGeDFD10JXlzHxyAb3IQQKAYcu1uxxw8/0ONZfUh38azEZQen8SUh/ka0Dcqr5c65fHpstNe AlIfK0T1JqqCm8rYOjcBiRs3Fmq91aUdTgF/sp8APX/LTrIrGUwnTpTGwciUMSHtacHslG8Gd 0EvIQANquaNSAM0ENuPFrUcaoVbI5LC3iYUSPzyg+qjOaljuLtNBxGwdFggC3xuLeNDvKjy82 u3NILPf2FGUJXxZ8V041eJzJDByNEzGjuh45hmcABAseGfx9cvVr/BCsjepon2zZy0g/+n6Re wZyXAkVdNA5JgmpJ8V3d+EovV2VQ+oG9fWei5cN6j5DV1ZyHs5AskcWDJanAEvrLiyL+GPrJF lw30dKIjA39aaQbrMa5JXICEFmRfQaNo1jRbCsCfNzhnwG/A/h8+HW1kdf9CTzH6UjrRLOnH9 8maiGSdAjiPZGai8SHUqzngHWyZYGQ8Cmls6u8ACR/ojm50xo1jokNtS8DwGEZaS3gP7f9it X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278359 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not opposed to patches to maybe make the C-r scenario less > surprising. But in general, C-r is an obscure command in this case; > it isn't an accident that it was not even documented in the user > manual until recently. The alternatives described above are IMO > better. I've thought a while about it, also about improvements. But I too came to the conclusion that the general approach of C-r is not optimal and we already have better alternatives, so I think telling the user to avoid the command and keep it for backward compatibility is the final solution for me. Michael.