From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Jacobson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: I bet bug-gnu-emacs doesn't even use SpamAssassin Date: 21 Jan 2003 03:42:56 +0800 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87el77620v.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043100404 25295 80.91.224.249 (20 Jan 2003 22:06:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sysadm@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ak40-0006ZH-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:06:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ajvl-0001Q9-00 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ajri-0000D3-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:53:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ajkN-00065r-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:46:24 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ajgF-0004jI-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ajem-0004cM-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:40:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ajej-0004c3-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:40:33 +0100 Original-Path: jidanni.org!news Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4269 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4269 (CC) Dear sysadm@gnu.org, surely SpamAssassin would have caught From: "Micheal Izaghi" Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:59:12 List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors under the NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION category? OK maybe not, but still I don't see any use of SpamAssassin in your headers, though there is some wording about spam. Mainly the MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLEs are the worst, using many bytes. You might filter with lines like if $h_X-Spam-Status: matches "KOREAN_UCE_SUBJECT|X_LIBRARY|FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD|MARKETING_PARTNERS|FROM_NO_USER|\ RATWARE|MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE|NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION|X_OSIRU_SPAM(WARE_SITE|_SRC)" -- http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780