Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards?

From: michael@cadilhac.name (Michaël Cadilhac)
To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards?
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:57:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eji2bksm.fsf@lrde.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <v9hcmymud8.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (Reiner Steib's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:35:15 +0200")

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1097 bytes --]

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 17 2007, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I have no opinion about this.
>> I don't know a lot about support for PS or PDF on various systems.
>>
>> I suggest this heuristic: if neither one of the formats has a clear
>> advantage in portability, pick the one that is most convenient on
>> GNU/Linux.
>
> How about adding PDF versions now for 22.2+ and the trunk now and
> decide about removing PS before releasing Emacs 23.1 (adding a note in
> the Makefile or FOR-RELEASE?

This is fine with me.  I think the NEWS file should contain a word
like :

** PDF files for the refcards and other cards are now shipped by
   default.  We plan to remove the PS files in a near future (23.1).

-- 
 |   Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac       |  I cannot reproduce this bug,          |
 |   http://michael.cadilhac.name   |    but I have installed a change       |
 |   JID/MSN:                       |      which I think will fix it.        |
 `----  michael.cadilhac@gmail.com  |          -- Kim F. Storm          -  --'

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel