From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Hansen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we relax requirement from gtk 2.6 to gtk 2.4. Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:42:05 +0200 Organization: disorganized Message-ID: <87ejhc9ode.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189068844 30862 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 08:54:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:54:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 10:54:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITD7j-00045L-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:54:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITD7h-0001Wy-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITD7b-0001Wk-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:53:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITD7W-0001Ur-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:53:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITD7V-0001Ug-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITD7V-0004vB-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ITD7I-0004nV-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:53:36 +0200 Original-Received: from e178058254.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.58.254]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:53:36 +0200 Original-Received: from david.hansen by e178058254.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:53:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e178058254.adsl.alicedsl.de Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VnWOp4rrYksKgQ+UsVrrytHpZZ0= X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77957 Archived-At: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:59:10 +0100 Leo wrote: > On 2007-09-05 23:33 +0100, David Koppelman wrote: >> Recently Emacs changed the gtk version from 2.4? to 2.6, perhaps to >> accommodate a use of gtk_image_new_from_icon_name and >> gtk_image_set_from_icon_name. If that's all, then perhaps it would be >> better to use 2.4-compatible functions to do the same thing. > > 2.10 has been out for a long time. What's the merit of using 2.4? Cairo dependency or was that added later?