From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:23:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhpCa-0000Mc-Sa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhpCZ-0000Ln-46
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:28 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhpCY-0000Lj-Mi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:26 -0400
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.181])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1IhpCY-0001VI-HV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:26 -0400
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so1402141ika
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi all,

i'd like to have your opinion on this.

I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.  
I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.  
It would be nice to be able to use `1' for the first view -- but
it's currently used to restrict the agenda view to the buffer.

My suggestion for a possible replacement for the `1' and `0' keys 
would be this:

 `<' : restrict to the buffer
`<<' : restrict to the region or subtree

Note: `<' could also be `@' since `C-c @' means select the current
subtree.

I think it's okay to have some kind of "incremental" restriction,
but I'm not sure about this.  And I'd definitely like to have the
[0-9] keys for my own agenda views :)

Did anyone ever meet the same need?

Thanks,

PS: I think today will be the craziest day in term of list traffic!

-- 
Bastien