From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:35:39 +0900 Message-ID: <87ej98f7bo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87wsn1fl72.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prssgacl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <851w58q24a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lk3gfg40.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208208433 17788 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 21:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 23:27:39 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlWCa-0007Tm-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWBv-0006hw-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWBp-0006h8-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWBl-0006fy-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWBk-0006fv-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlWBP-00044f-RQ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542581535AC; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:25:42 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 741C71A29F3; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:35:39 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" 2785829fe37c XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95217 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > What I proposed was a more generic concept where use of signatures and > > the EOL convention would (at least to the user) appear as buffer-local > > variables. Note the *at least to the user*. > [For EOLs], I disagree: EOL processing definitely need to take > place when talking to subprocesses, Yes, it has to *take place* when talking to subprocesses, but I don't see why it should be controlled by proliferation of (user-visible) coding systems.