From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:25:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ej53fbu3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86wsivy37r.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com>
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> My point is simple: redundant testing reduces the chance of false
> positives. How is anticipating a system failure an argument for never
> testing? I can't follow your reasoning, sorry.
Redundant testing also increases the chance of false negatives; those
opposed effects go hand in hand. I see no reason to suppose that
false positives are more harmful than false negatives at this stage,
quite the reverse, that's all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 22:27 eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? Alan Mackenzie
2008-07-31 19:17 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-07-31 19:18 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-08-01 15:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-01 17:08 ` Romain Francoise
2008-08-01 20:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-02 4:18 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-08-04 16:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-04 17:49 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-08-04 18:38 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-05 8:20 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-08-05 13:57 ` buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?) Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-05 20:25 ` Stephen J. Turnbull [this message]
2008-08-08 15:26 ` place to send build failure reports? (was: buildbots) Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-08 15:58 ` place to send build failure reports? Chong Yidong
2008-08-03 19:02 ` eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? Romain Francoise
2008-08-04 16:31 ` Ted Zlatanov
2008-08-01 16:10 ` Progress: " Alan Mackenzie
2008-08-07 19:25 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ej53fbu3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp \
--to=stephen@xemacs.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.