From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#936: fixing/disabling the bug news->mail gateway Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:30:10 +0800 Message-ID: <87eils901p.fsf@wanchan.jasonrumney.net> References: <873a29lnnz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263483942 24581 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 15:45:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , 936@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 16:45:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVRt6-0006DJ-07 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:45:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRt6-0005Di-MT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:45:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVReU-0006gy-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVReO-0006bL-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41873 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVReO-0006b6-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:43404) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVReL-00006u-Vk; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so17634289bwz.26 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:30:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=iXmSsCT4vpibLceGYRwZtViwzAkZdJAC8buDjkTBoEc=; b=jYVhomkNBj7lUrfjJpnUNyc4AwUyqZwORRYPAvzO2P7+vlsUta7W9jROj2zk0zUApe llloD6Cin8DKSXYZZxfRfj5wveNlpVOkSBzFBcfXu/p+/HMrOLdM6Hat/jGXqI50dPU1 EX07pNseoYfB82MW5rKEM1K9fG4GC5Ncbh5kc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=R1qmAO9c2cCxGOhb90Qqz8/8LeVmmWOGuFD5HKP3NJNYdqIS0omuCo0wO6GDOoNTgX Jsuq0oJW4AXxL+aAf7i5TaBZDjy+4sSqSeGTPFwYO5kkcSS7BqQZ2gcLAJYuFNoJuKzx qoDyZeFyWlgY4LRynlgihDp1plOGOcTTNpNFA= Original-Received: by 10.204.32.131 with SMTP id c3mr509640bkd.190.1263483016083; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:30:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net ([72.14.240.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm384759bwz.6.2010.01.14.07.30.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:30:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADC051885; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:30:10 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:46:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119999 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I agree there is no _need_ for people to be able to post bug reports > as news. But what would be the practical result of a "one-way gateway" > when someone tries to post a bug report as news? I'm not sure what the difficulty is in making gnu.emacs.bug a moderated group with the bug tracker address as moderator, and output from the bug tracker considered as the moderated content.