From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3643: Bug#567083: emacs -Q doesn't fit on the user's screen Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:45:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87eikex6qc.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <87wry734td.fsf@tochka.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266816805 11467 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2010 05:33:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3643@debbugs.gnu.org, 567083@bugs.debian.org To: evgeny.zubok@tochka.ru Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 11:31:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8Uy-0000jX-0R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:53:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nj8Ux-0000oL-Cp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:53:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nj8Uq-0000oE-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43869 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nj8Uo-0000o6-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8Un-000155-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8Un-00014y-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8O2-0001Aa-9m; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87d48x5n1a.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3643 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3643-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3643.12667455274424 (code B ref 3643); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2010 09:45:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8NR-00019J-Nf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.202] helo=homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj8NP-00018t-13 for 3643@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from jidanni.org (125-230-45-109.dynamic.hinet.net [125.230.45.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED324D85C; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:45:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:46:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:35226 Archived-At: >>>>> "EMZ" == Evgeny M Zubok writes: EMZ> As I understand from the following discussion in the upstream, IceWM EMZ> not to blame for described emacs behaviour. I think the bug should be EMZ> reassigned to wishlist items of emacs23 package. Am I right? Upstream EMZ> considers an interim solution to use smaller default font, but it has EMZ> not announced what will be a final solution. See also * http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3643 * http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4995 I give up.