From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: AW: Fwd: CEDET sync Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:08:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87eik2bt9m.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <86bpf7q3fc.wl%lluis@ginnungagap.pc.ac.upc.edu> <87wrxvyijr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B8C42E2.3080308@siege-engine.com> <7697A57B1AD9104F993CDF6A5B69430C09227D1F24@CORPMAIL08.corp.capgemini.com> <7697A57B1AD9104F993CDF6A5B69430C09225DFF6E@CORPMAIL08.corp.capgemini.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267546167 14178 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 16:09:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , Stefan Monnier , "Eric M. Ludlam" To: "Berndl\, Klaus" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 17:09:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUeo-00045Q-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:09:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUen-0000BF-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUec-00008A-Mx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34222 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUeb-00007h-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUeZ-0001S4-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.119]:38506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUeZ-0001S0-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014112.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o22G8sWH032382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:08:54 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAEB0C05D; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:08:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7697A57B1AD9104F993CDF6A5B69430C09225DFF6E@CORPMAIL08.corp.capgemini.com> (Klaus Berndl's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:59:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121551 Archived-At: "Berndl, Klaus" writes: > well, If i remember right, i have i mind that RMS told me some years > ago that "we do not want have XEmacs code in our > code-base"... therefore i thought that packages have to be stripped > concerning their XEmacs-code before merging into Emacs... but maybe i > have misunderstood this...... You probably misunderstood. XEmacs does not require a copyright assignment from its contributors, so we typically will not incorporate XEmacs code into Emacs. But if you write a package that supports both Emacs and XEmacs, and have a copyright assignment, there is no problem including the package into Emacs.