From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:29 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268242812 978 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2010 17:40:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:40:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 18:40:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPt7-0000g4-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:40:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPt5-0000YO-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPqw-0007hv-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53915 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPqu-0007hR-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPqt-0002Bi-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:48 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPqt-0002BM-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:47 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPqm-0007xE-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c234a.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.35.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c234a.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c234a.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wmTDXRsTqznMWJGlAQp9B4/bSkQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121776 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Chong Yidong >> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:09:29 -0500 >> >> This is also a good point for people to chime in on their plans for >> Emacs 24. Stefan and I have had some discussions about this; here is >> our current list of major changes that we'd like to see included: >> >> * The package manager (Tromey et al.). >> >> * Bidi support (Eli). > > Does this mean it is okay to merge my local bidi branch with mainline > any time I feel like it? Wouldn't it make more sense to push your local bidi branch as a branch first? That way, people can experiment with it and possibly indicate problems. Right now, at least the git mirror only carries a rather old bidi branch. -- David Kastrup