From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bidi branch Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:10:37 +0900 Message-ID: <87eijl7k0y.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <833a073kss.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrxj1o92.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdd220yk.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5nq1vox.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq920w4t.fsf@gnu.org> <83tysk11t0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268663778 32576 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2010 14:36:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: James Cloos , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 15 15:36:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrBOq-0004Fg-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:36:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrBOp-0006Gw-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NrBOl-0006Gf-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41580 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrBOg-0006FW-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrBOa-0003ar-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:59923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrBOX-0003ZN-2y; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DED1535AE; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:11:01 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4EF41A3800; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:10:37 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83tysk11t0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122002 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > IMO, it doesn't make sense to publish code that wasn't yet made to > compile on anything but GNU/Windows (i.e., the Windows build will be > broken), and which I never tried to run in a GUI session. Why would > anyone want to see such code so badly? Because they've got lots of time on their hands. Of course it's up to you, but there are a *lot* of very skilled hackers around here, and anybody who's abused their retinas with UAX #9 knows there is not much short of a full-blown operating system that has the hack value of a bidi algorithm! :-)