From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why and not "config.h" ? Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:10:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87eieorshv.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87wrsgs5t3.fsf@telefonica.net> <4C4FD6DB.7080901@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280301077 7831 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2010 07:11:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 09:11:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0nK-0003u7-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oe0nK-0004jq-4x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48180 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oe0nD-0004jb-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0nA-0005Uw-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0nA-0005Uf-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0n8-0003pH-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:02 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.42.13.171 ([83.42.13.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:02 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.42.13.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.42.13.171 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7P2KC41bKoyVeTd4K4nPtbVRzG4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127916 Archived-At: Andreas Röhler writes: > just a language question, not to get non-native english speakers -as > you and me :-) bewildered. > Does "<...>" really mean curly? > > IMHO these "{...}" are curly... > > Do I misunderstand something? You are right. `<>' are usually called "angle brackets."