From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Re: orgmode as a reference system: Storing private/sensitive
 information and syncing across devices.
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:15:28 +0200
Message-ID: <87eiconh0v.fsf@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTinE-eOmmSHMphu_B88D=EZyiGwi=1BA=0pmoaR0@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fwx4oygj.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<AANLkTinJ0-+L22x8k+Gfa4C_p98ktOwWDXCsr=t9XdUN@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37847 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxpaD-00074h-HO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:15:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1OxpaC-0000fL-9W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:15:37 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:47079 helo=mail.gmx.net)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1OxpaB-0000fB-QK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:15:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJ0-+L22x8k+Gfa4C_p98ktOwWDXCsr=t9XdUN@mail.gmail.com>
	(Marcelo de Moraes Serpa's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:33:33 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm, never heard about it :)
>
> But I assume that -- at least in terms of network security -- having
> the WebDav server below a HTTPS layer is enough. This would at least
> put a layer of security for when I'm syncing between devices (in this
> case OSX<->WebDav<->MobileOrg). I know, however, there might be other
> holes or someone might even me able to just sit in front of my
> computer and fiddle through the org text files, so that might be a
> good use-case for org-crypt.


Hi Marcelo,



unencrypted data is _not_ secure.

Encrypt your data and you'll have a chance to lock your bank account
card just in time, once your iPod gets lost (or stolen).

(Is it necessary to carry sensitive data around on your iPod??? Can't
believe it...)


As you might have guessed, I'm one of those "more neurotic" persons.
And more and more people join us --- to late in many cases.  Encryption
is cheep.  Unencrypted data can be expensive.



   Sebastian