From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:19:18 +0100
Message-ID: <87ei8sae89.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin-VZAm9K5DOmRe0KKxQpxyW1aOWkKVbcgRDHM9@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42167 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pa8ff-0004EA-Ao
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:19:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Pa8fe-0005OC-5t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:19:35 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:60416)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Pa8fd-0005O7-Ug
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:19:34 -0500
Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so14931171wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:19:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-VZAm9K5DOmRe0KKxQpxyW1aOWkKVbcgRDHM9@mail.gmail.com>
	(Torsten Wagner's message of "Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:09:14 +0900")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-mode ml <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Torsten,

Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com> writes:

> Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point.
> Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to
> shorten it to [Org].

I agreed this would be an improvement to use [Org].

If nobody have a strong objection, I'll make this change in two days.

Thanks for bringing this up,

-- 
 Bastien