From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.3 release candidate Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:11:01 -0500 Message-ID: <87ei6qwta2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pqqbze4t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4D6CE1E8.6080502@online.de> <87d3maraqw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4D6D3562.4010209@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299007363 29431 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2011 19:22:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 01 20:22:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuV9V-0000Qv-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:22:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuV9T-000373-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:22:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46199 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuUyQ-0006DD-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuUyP-0001v0-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:36944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuUyP-0001up-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:11:05 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225133.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p21JB2oL001980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 496E01602DE; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:11:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D6D3562.4010209@online.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:05:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136681 Archived-At: Andreas R=C3=B6hler writes: >>> Compiling MY-PATH/uni-input.el >>> Wrote MY-PATH/uni-input.elc >>> make[2]: Leaving directory `MY-PATH/leim' >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `MY-PATH/emacs-23.3' >>> make: *** [bootstrap] Fehler 2 >>> >>> Compilation exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Mar 1 10:41:13 >> >> I don't understand why Make is signalling an error here. Could you >> describe the procedure you used to build emacs, including the arguments >> supplied to configure and to make? > > CFLAGS=3D"-g -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls" ./configure > than from inside Emacs > M-x compile > make -k bootstrap I can't reproduce the error. For me, the above steps end with ... Compiling /home/cyd/pretest/emacs-23.3/leim/quail/uni-input.el Wrote /home/cyd/pretest/emacs-23.3/leim/quail/uni-input.elc make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/cyd/pretest/emacs-23.3/leim' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cyd/pretest/emacs-23.3' Compilation finished at Tue Mar 1 13:54:19 so it looks like your bootstrap finished, except that Make exited with code 2 for no apparent reason. (There is nothing noteworthy in the compile log that you sent me separately.) Anyone using SuSE 10.2 and able to try reproducing the problem?