From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehzlnaxj.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> <87mxeaar26.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6DFF55.3000708@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315834371 10947 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 13:32:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 15:32:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R36cw-0005bA-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:32:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R36cv-0005YE-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46263) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R36cp-0005SR-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R36ck-0005Zh-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm2.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.18]:43032 helo=telefonica.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R36cj-0005YX-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost6.adm.correo ([10.20.102.127]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id Xogk1h00a2kvMAa3MpYTuN; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:32:27 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.59.1.185]) by IMPmailhost6.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id XpYR1h0093zVkuj1mpYSzj; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:32:27 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-original-sender: 981711563@telefonica.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.4.138.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143930 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> ... but the only frame >> of my Emacs session is deleted from time to time forcing me to create a >> new one with emacsclient (I'm using the daemon.) That's a bug. > > This would constitute a bug by itself. Does it also happen when you do > `delete-windows-on' for the only visible buffer? Yes, the frame is deleted. Setting window-auto-delete to nil or 'window does not help. Just tried again with emacs -Q --daemon : same problem. > What does `other-visible-frames-p' return when you're on "the only > frame of your Emacs session"? t On a non-daemonized emacs session, `delete-windows-on' does not delete the frame and `other-visible-frames-p' returns nil.