From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Antoine Levitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2042: Ido-mode : filtering does not keep ordering Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:54:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehz5t31h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <6fa54e4e0901250554q1519cba5t83df1577e2cbc132@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316940935 25270 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2011 08:55:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:55:35 +0000 (UTC) To: 2042@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 10:55:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUk-0001Aq-0v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:55:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUj-000640-F8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUg-00063k-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUf-0005Fe-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUf-0005Fa-Kb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kVG-0002Gn-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <6fa54e4e0901250554q1519cba5t83df1577e2cbc132@mail.gmail.com> Resent-From: Antoine Levitt Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2042 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13169409538710 (code B ref -1); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2011 08:55:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kV6-0002GR-RR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kV3-0002GJ-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUR-0005Ep-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:41445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUR-0005El-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUQ-00063K-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUP-0005EA-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUP-0005De-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7kUM-00012e-7t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:55:06 +0200 Original-Received: from ney92-7-78-233-218-202.fbx.proxad.net ([78.233.218.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:55:06 +0200 Original-Received: from antoine.levitt by ney92-7-78-233-218-202.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:55:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ney92-7-78-233-218-202.fbx.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 04:56:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51810 Archived-At: 24/09/11 18:20, Leo > On 2009-01-25 21:54 +0800, Antoine Levitt wrote: >> Hi, >> When buffer switching in Ido, filtering the list of available buffers does >> not keep the original ordering of buffers (from most recent to oldest). >> Ie if I have for instance buffers foobar and barfoo, in this order, if I >> type bar, they are displayed to me as barfoo foobar. I understand this is a >> reasonable behavior in a number of case, but it's annoying when using ido to >> quickly toggle between working buffers, where I have old and forgotten >> buffers pop up as the first option in the completion list. Would it be >> possible to add a switch ? >> >> Antoine Levitt > > I occasionally try iswitch-mode and find its buffer switching much more > pleasant to use than ido's. The trouble is ido tries to be smart in > ordering matches. Sadly that gets in the way most of the time. > > I wonder if people are willing to try the following (preliminary) patch > and see if they miss anything. That's much better! Thanks!