From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: logdone enhancement Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:22:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehg2eyjt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <512DA5E5.7040703@lbl.gov> <87vc9eupes.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <864ngy9ky3.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ehg2t8fj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86wqtu8446.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAg2j-0007zM-TB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:24:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAg2T-0008IJ-IZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:23:29 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAg2T-0008HU-BY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:23:13 -0500 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAg2i-0005my-Cp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:23:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86wqtu8446.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:25 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > But first, For me, the question comes down to: do we agree that John (in this > case) won't be allowed anymore to write such an entry? > > *** NOTE Assets:Receivable:CEG > #+begin_src sh :results value :exports results > ledger reg --inject=Expected '^income:ceg' > ledger reg --sort date -b 2007 receivable:CEG > #+end_src > :PROPERTIES: > :ID: 8BEF6C42-8B23-495B-9421-3810B58907A1 > :VISIBILITY: folded > :CREATED: [2010-06-18 Fri 07:37] > :END: No. The rule is about the SCHEDULED line, not about the :PROPERTIES: drawer. So John is allowed to write such an entry. `org-fixup-indentation' is just a way to _improve_ the indentation, so it should do its best in order to align SCHEDULED cookies (and friends) *and* drawers. If it can't align some drawers, it should just ignore them. And be happy with what it did. Thanks for testing, -- Bastien