From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Globbing in completion Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:43:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehf1g4tx.fsf@web.de> References: <87ehf4nvc3.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364337820 19842 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2013 22:43:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 23:44:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKcb3-00057r-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:44:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKcae-0000cq-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKcab-0000ck-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKcaY-0002pX-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:51959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKcaY-0002p5-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.135.66]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsyZi-1Umqt51mg6-011zEw; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:43:29 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:19:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:DW3xR3Fk91iDAXzjsrN67aYrdsUDuWzg6tm6C2K5tkp rJqvTlrZPmdsI7T9MXk90nnD/okNFWR7B5BMKLBuMz1WCbJpM0 WmU0aemAWwHp2+PYOz8hx6mgmAD/IpGBj8ohLPLac5t+7nvBjU OiYdCuQCgFJFwfJAt7qCUMFqs8ps1Kdwigb1n9l8gDM4JMQ+uA xfUeCiYDoxyyM9XLqVQhjU/yRcz0TXSW/C90E2U5dE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158252 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > (require 'bytecomp) ; just for the defvar > > Now > > C-h v *compil*warn* TAB TAB > > > > I would expect "byte-compile-warnings" among the matches, but that's not > > the case. > > Indeed, that looks like a bug. For some reason "*compil*warn*" gets > completed (after the first TAB) to "byte-compile-*-warn" rather than to > "byte-compile*-warn". Please make it a bug report, so we have > a bug-number to track it. Done - bug#14061. > > Same with "*compil-warn*". Why? > > OTOH for "*compil-warn*", I do get byte-compile-warnings in the list. Right - sorry, my mistake. Michael.