From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Can `org-element-map' act on secondary-strings? Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:48:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehb99n86.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87li5jrbx3.fsf@gmail.com> <871u7bfw4x.fsf@gmail.com> <87obada5ck.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqp1ec0b.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip0l9rxu.fsf@gmail.com> <87pputdx5a.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwBo0-0005YD-Ti for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:48:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwBnz-0000uN-KI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:48:40 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwBnz-0000u5-CU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:48:39 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwBnw-0001Cx-44 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:48:36 +0200 Received: from e178063147.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.63.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:48:36 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178063147.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:48:36 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > You don't need `org-data' type. The tree root doesn't have any property > anyway. I used that because I wanted the whole parse-tree as return value, but no matter what `org-element-map' returns, it changes the parse-tree by side-effects anyway, so I can just ignore the return value and use the modified parse-tree stored somewhere instead - right? -- cheers, Thorsten