From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to communicate with a running external process with Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:06:03 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <87ehao512c.fsf@informatimago.com> References: <7DEC2F40B9E0874681480168A47FD3C11AF1E5E6@MSGPEXCEI32B.mfad.mfroot.org> <87txjlr9js.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwpd3xgy.fsf@informatimago.com> <87ppu99gqy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374620810 17572 80.91.229.3 (23 Jul 2013 23:06:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:06:50 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 24 01:06:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lfQ-0005IM-8C for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:06:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lfP-0006Ba-Lo for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lfD-0006B4-9V for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lf9-0007ts-VM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lf9-0007ti-Ow for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lf5-0004qj-9P for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from 90.24.241.80 ([90.24.241.80]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from pjb by 90.24.241.80 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:06:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.24.241.80 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZDE5OTJhNjQxZDJiYTU4ZTRjZDZlYWQzNGQxZGNkM2IwYWJhMzg4OQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:92355 Archived-At: Thorsten Jolitz writes: > I did not mean Common Lisp, but there is a Swank implementation for my > Uncommon Lisp of interest, and it did not occur to me to consider it - > so thanks for this marvelous tip! So just loading swank in that other lisp, and starting a swank sever: (swank:create-server :port 4005) ; in CL you can then connect to it from emacs with M-x slime-connect RET RET RET You can even do some kind of "RPC" (Remote Procedure Call) in both directions (trivial from slime, have a look at [1] to evaluate emacs lisp expressions from the other lisp). [1]: http://paste.lisp.org/display/22414 -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. You know you've been lisping too long when you see a recent picture of George Lucas and think "Wait, I thought John McCarthy was dead!" -- Dalek_Baldwin