From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Outline cycling does not preserve point's position Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:11:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh8uqu9s.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130910075345.GP20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <25A21DB7-B2E5-47BB-8A64-594A15CB24B8@gmail.com> <20130910085057.GQ20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <4ED2509E-8A2E-4ED2-BFCF-CB7B27F1D2B4@gmail.com> <20130910095043.GR20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87a9jk8wmr.fsf@gmail.com> <20130910185843.GA20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <871u4w8nkq.fsf@gmail.com> <47C95833-7AC7-493C-AA1B-9E733549A443@gmail.com> <20130911122423.GG20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87sixaedhc.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK2vs-0004aj-DM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:11:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK2vj-0002Pl-VS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:11:24 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]:42589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK2vj-0002Oo-LR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:11:15 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p61so7630227wes.26 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:11:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sixaedhc.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:24:55 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jambunathan K writes: > Suvayu Ali writes: > >>> And I agree with you, beginning of line is a good target column. >> >> On reading Nicolas's explanation, I agree too. This is better. > > The decision should be based on what the user would do after doing a > C-down and C-up. > > If *you* use C-down and C-up for persusal (as yourself say), I don't > think you will use C-k immediately. I sense that you are not > representing yourself in a consistent way. I don't think regular `forward-paragraph' cares about what the user do with it. It puts point at beginning of lines and that's it. `org-forward-linear-element' exists because some users want C-down with a more intense `forward-paragraph' flavour. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou