From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9476: 24.0.50; `self-insert-command': Wrong type argument: wholenump Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:34:25 -0800 Message-ID: <87eh3c94lq.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <898DAEE11E4E4CDDBC9A1BFE6F9F12FD@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391927771 25953 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 06:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 06:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9476@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 07:36:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCO00-0001Yq-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 07:36:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCO00-0006Yl-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:36:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzs-0006XT-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:36:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzn-0002Xl-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzn-0002Xh-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzm-0005rn-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9476 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9476-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9476.139192775822534 (code B ref 9476); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9476) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 06:35:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59054 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzg-0005rG-E4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:53401) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzb-0005r1-69 for 9476@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCNzM-0007Aa-9b; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 07:35:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <898DAEE11E4E4CDDBC9A1BFE6F9F12FD@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:41:56 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCNzM-0007Aa-9b MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392532537.02838@uzU4u/suGhTZ+kvjOnm9pw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85067 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Please provide a more user-friendly error message for this: > > emacs -Q > C-- 6 a Fixed on trunk. But I'm not really sure it's the right thing to do, come to think of it. Lots of functions take a repetition argument, and I'm not sure we really want to litter them all with hand-written error messages. On the other hand, `self-insert-command' is kinda special, so... Feel free to revert my patch if it's not quite what we want. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/