From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Documentation for NOBLOCKING property? Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:14:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87egsu8v6l.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87a93ioc5k.wl-jamshark70@qq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsNdl-0003UM-Sr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:15:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsNdZ-0003e4-W5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:15:05 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsNdZ-0003dr-PC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:14:57 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XsNdW-0008TI-Uf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:14:54 +0100 Received: from 168.96.135.37.dynamic.jazztel.es ([37.135.96.168]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:14:54 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 168.96.135.37.dynamic.jazztel.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:14:54 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, James Harkins writes: > Just now, I needed to exempt a couple of subtrees from TODO dependency > blocking. I found that you can do this by setting a subtree property > NOBLOCKING. > > This option appears to be undocumented (by which I mean, it isn't > mentioned in the manual's dependency checking page, and a web search > for "orgmode todo noblocking" turned up pages about TODOs but none > with any obvious reference to noblocking). I found the property by > grepping the .el sources for "blocked" to find the org-todo function, > and then scanning the function until I found something that looked > like property access. > > Was it intentional to omit this from the documentation? Indeed I have *never* heard of this. I guess it should be documented or something. Would you provide a patch? —Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!