From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 8608c10 01/02: Use a simple list of symbols in GnuTLS peer verification. Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:25:39 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87egsre1zg.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <20141125140840.27975.96096@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416929140 7566 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2014 15:25:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:25:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 25 16:25:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzb-0000No-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:25:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzb-0005ol-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:25:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzS-0005nZ-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:25:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzM-0005hc-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzM-0005hU-NC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XtHzM-00009Q-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:25:12 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:25:12 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:25:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Q60vRI/MLvnLDuS6YbcSFPdAdg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178247 Archived-At: On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:15:47 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Teodor Zlatanov writes: >> +DEFUN ("gnutls-peer-status-warning-describe", Fgnutls_peer_status_warning_describe, Sgnutls_peer_status_warning_describe, 1, 1, 0, >> + doc: /* Describe the warning of a GnuTLS peer status from `gnutls-peer-status'.*/) >> + (Lisp_Object status_symbol) >> +{ >> + CHECK_SYMBOL (status_symbol); >> + >> + if ( EQ (status_symbol, intern (":invalid"))) >> + return build_string ("certificate could not be verified"); LMI> This is now just a symbol-to-string mapping, so perhaps it should just LMI> be moved to nsm.el instead? `gnutls-boot' uses it, so it wouldn't work. I think. I looked in GnuTLS but I don't see a convenient way to avoid storing that data on our side. All the strerror stuff is for error codes but not verification codes. Ted