From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:44:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87egn9955w.fsf@yahoo.fr> References: <87lhhjuq26.fsf@gmail.com> <87fv7r3rbh.fsf@gmail.com> <83iocn0x3x.fsf@gnu.org> <87sibr2b10.fsf@gmail.com> <87618maoh1.fsf@yahoo.fr> <838udi26zp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429872214 30726 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2015 10:43:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Richard , ohwoeowho@gmail.com, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 24 12:43:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylb4u-0006R6-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:43:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylb4u-0008Nm-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:43:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylb4q-0008Nf-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylb4l-0005iQ-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:15526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylb4l-0005iK-Gf; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:43:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0FABgdOlWkD4Xx/2dsb2JhbABbhDqCTLF/AQEBAQEBBpk/AoIJAQEBAQEBgQuEIQEBBHkQCAMhJQ8BBEkTiBYBFLhrjHgBhhEBAQgCAR+GFoIzgm6FBAeELQWbf4cnhG2JNyODdjwxgkQBAQE Original-Received: from mathsrv4.ulb.ac.be (HELO localhost) ([164.15.133.241]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2015 12:43:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838udi26zp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:34:50 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 164.15.128.112 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185850 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I agree. But if this underscore always hides inside the likes of BVAR > and KVAR, and is never explicitly seen anywhere else, then we don't > really need INTERNAL_FIELD, do we? If you say we don't need it, I certainly believe you. I have zero experience. -- Nico