From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Carter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (ELPA website design) Re: Emacs logo proposal Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:31:38 -0400 Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) Message-ID: <87eggmi7l1.fsf@ahungry.com> References: <876121mjdw.fsf@petton.fr> <87twpilrls.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445571139 26220 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 03:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 03:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , Nicolas Petton , emacs-devel To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 05:32:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpT5F-0006lV-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:32:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpT5E-0003UT-I2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:32:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpT4z-0003Tc-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:31:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpT4u-0005eQ-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:31:45 -0400 Original-Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:56061 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpT4u-0005eF-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02BA0432C; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:31:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:45:07 +0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 69.164.215.200 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192447 Archived-At: Yuri Khan writes: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Nicolas Petton wrot= e: > >> I just put a first draft of my work on the GNU ELPA online at >> http://nicolas-petton.fr/ressources/elpa/ > > I=E2=80=99d like to voice my concern with this fragment of CSS: > > =3D=3D=3D layout.css#line=3D97,102 > .container { > padding: 80px; > width: 960px; > margin: 0 auto; > } > =3D=3D=3D > > This causes the width of the page to be at least 80+960+80 =3D 1020 > pixels, leading to horizontal scrolling on narrower displays. > > An important case of a narrow display occurs when two windows are > tiled side-by-side on a typical 24=E2=80=B3 1920=C3=971080 or 1920=C3=971= 200 desktop > monitor. (This size and resolution is when it becomes really > inconvenient to keep the browser maximized to the whole screen, as > lines become too wide to read.) > > Consider also mobile users, whose typical screen width is likely to be > just about 2.5=E2=80=B3, or 240 CSS pixels if taken at face value. > >> It's of course rather unfinished, but gives a taste of where I'm >> heading. > Agreed - in marketing terms, the design definitely needs to be "responsive". I have a MELPA related site I had put together here: http://slugelisp.ahungry.com/ Which auto-formats the layout based on screen width (using twitter's bootstrap library - a set of js/css designed for various layouts). The purple/pink color scheme looks great though! --=20 Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com