From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7917: [PATCH] cc-mode: not all templates are types Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:40:06 +1030 Message-ID: <87egc0rlpt.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87egc0uh24.fsf@gnus.org> <56CFF0EE.6070300@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456470683 23861 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2016 07:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Colascione , 7917@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 08:11:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYR-0007EP-Nu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYQ-00068Q-PB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYM-00066c-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYI-0008Tc-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYI-0008TU-MR; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCYI-00068E-EQ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7917 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 7917-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7917.145647064623527 (code B ref 7917); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7917) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2016 07:10:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCY1-00067P-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCY0-00067G-Dp for 7917@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:10:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [175.103.25.178] (helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aZCXU-0006ZT-QI; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:10:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56CFF0EE.6070300@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:30:06 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aZCXU-0006ZT-QI MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1457075414.45999@lMopjzMwUUHnE+fFfh34bw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113855 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione writes: > For me --- empty scratch buffer, c++-mode, emacs -Q, pasting in > this example, the name of the second function is fontified as a type, > not a function name. In the third function, in the call to foo, foo > is also fontified as a type, although it shouldn't be fontified as > anything at all. Oh, yeah, that's true. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no