From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23092: 25.0.92; Minibuffer completion fails to resize completion window if reused during same command Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:34:50 -0300 Message-ID: <87egb1exw5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fuviigpw.fsf@gmail.com> <83k2ku4bb5.fsf@gnu.org> <8737riibq2.fsf@gmail.com> <837fgu49m1.fsf@gnu.org> <56F24F21.4040107@gmx.at> <878u19gn38.fsf@gmail.com> <56F2E647.7040400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458765328 26567 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2016 20:35:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23092@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 21:35:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUr-0000lH-EY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:35:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45982 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUq-0007MH-Ta for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUh-000783-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUc-00066l-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUc-00066h-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUc-0006Ox-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23092 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23092-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23092.145876529924594 (code B ref 23092); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2016 20:34:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUY-0006Ob-VQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:34191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipUY-0006OP-0U for 23092@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m184so64254285iof.1 for <23092@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D2KQZPsoy8LAFGUV0xEpQJPeUAno1kUaUc6UDhz5AxM=; b=kKL1VUlbs9dJwfGhgXAj8cFf/Z47wpqq4m6WJ2qQb+H4wisD64aKnNMppnmKF6XYYg h7P63OgagF0jBmBFZiQAWB7ObgKTJaqgRRawgKBNYu1q+nhllrQXshmv0kCqxx1y3n3Y C/jpSvePKOdKLypuMeAyvtmQSZfK7bl/0d6jivPVNLf7ZgEViWT2b9167RRI9LyEInFr NEQCNI4mo2yytxkr+htw7oC2gcSp6408I5GlGhHgtkFGedVd5lHOndH58kZmC6FkGHZI PYJsNbgQRnA2xa4nd9faLgDecmK/fV3nFaqvV0xqzlDTccu8PUGBlv2lHAa7i+wloZ4g WWKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D2KQZPsoy8LAFGUV0xEpQJPeUAno1kUaUc6UDhz5AxM=; b=VDJ7+tYVgWCm38ogWbwpqiYt7ktZEt6mCNyeDb6NqXScgF2FMQm3N+HKXR/C6rqRbc pS8KV6O8t2Es5gC25CJYwu14g4WndqjoJMKFmbfYih5EV62vbWTbvm5NfCSonhbrTo2i huyvXgAWrqBioipj3c/F8ILxNhCemEIDz2HVsPchXyNR0qFt5kS/EfLYE6o3o0+jlS/S rb1MBWux4/Kj/wZrujtXLb9bPFzAU2kzUG4ZGvIkK7b29tkZbKdZcUvq1Oz9iqqvWT5l TvGGYGS0ByOlmk9VMqSdFwWky/Ov4BSD3vLt9fSzylvo+bcg06jujyVANWu903rhdiJe +euQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKEPzKq/PQ+ekYWbVTaP2U0u5XwX+wYpL99uoU7y3JYRRCNj2n9E/VjDI4f2iBeBg== X-Received: by 10.107.166.13 with SMTP id p13mr6172014ioe.140.1458765292444; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none (T86F8.WPA.Dal.Ca. [134.190.134.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b142sm1794519ioe.27.2016.03.23.13.34.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:34:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56F2E647.7040400@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:53:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115415 Archived-At: At 19:53 +0100 on Wednesday 2016-03-23, martin rudalics wrote: > > I'm not sure whether we should by default change something in this case. > Juri has designed the present concept and I would rather leave it to him > how to proceed. By all means. I just felt it was my "duty" to point out what might (or might not) be an oversight in the design. > Does enabling =E2=80=98temp-buffer-resize-mode=E2=80=99 handle that case = sufficiently > well? Yes after a day of use, I can say that `temp-buffer-resize-mode' provides much better behaviour (IMO), and properly supports the type of use cases I mentioned. However the point is moot (for this user at least), because with your code from bug#23093, viz. (customize-set-variable 'display-buffer-alist '(("\\*Completions\\*" display-buffer-pop-up-window))) I get my completions buffer on the right half of my frame, and it would not make sense for that to change size (I wouldn't like it, anyway), so I won't need to use `temp-buffer-resize-mode'. Thanks. Regards, N.