From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Question on nested-blocks syntax
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 15:52:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87eg9cac8s.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <87bn4j8rvz.fsf@espresso.zeitkraut.de>
	<87inyrijq0.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <8737pv8osk.fsf@espresso.zeitkraut.de>
	<874mabiee0.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87d1ox210x.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55215)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1azP86-0006Zy-5h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 09:52:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1azP81-0003HM-1V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 09:52:17 -0400
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:38626)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1azP80-0003HA-Po
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 09:52:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d1ox210x.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 07 May
	2016 20:09:18 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> I sympathize with aesthetics concerns, Org syntax, particularly blocks,
>> is "massive", but I think this is not a sufficient motivation here.
>
> I wonder what you mean by "massive" here?  Do you mean the fact that there
> is an explicit beginning and end?

I mean that, visually, it can be a bit invasive, at times.

> Aside: I think a big getting rid of the FORTRAN-70 "touch" (capitalized
> keywords and delimiters) would make Org must more ascetically pleasing.
> (We=E2=80=99d just need to change default usage of templates and block
> capitalization).

I guess we could do that.=20

However, I think it is already easy to write every keyword as lower
case. Moreover, there is no lower case for "#".


Regards,