From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing bugs from the blockers Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87eg96l06p.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <831t569wwu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463135469 12617 80.91.229.3 (13 May 2016 10:31:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 12:30:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMx-0002X5-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMw-0005Gj-Lq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMr-00058C-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:30:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMn-0004rF-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMm-0004qa-Sq; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:30:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.143.127.196] (helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1AMh-0001FP-73; Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831t569wwu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 13 May 2016 11:36:49 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203821 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > My conclusion from reviewing these bugs is: I don't really understand > how come some of the bugs were designated as "blocking". Did you remove the "block" from the bugs you didn't feel were block-worthy? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no