From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Last commit breaks macOS build Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:53:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87eg0h2vaa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <103c5ca4-dba4-9cf1-1c15-535684235be9@alice.it> <1f69c5da-eb8a-740e-873f-4809a04e2d77@alice.it> <8360lteb39.fsf@gnu.org> <51ffb0cd-ce29-e2ae-a1ee-2fc01c299710@alice.it> <831swhe8v7.fsf@gnu.org> <6d04ad51-6ecc-4a01-a8f1-53217f219e38@alice.it> <83zij5cs3d.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvf52wwh.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83y3ypcql1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inpt2w9m.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83wpe9cpyc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483642412 29706 195.159.176.226 (5 Jan 2017 18:53:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:53:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 19:53:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPDAG-0006x1-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:53:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPDAK-0007Hg-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPDAD-0007Hb-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPDAD-0004Nc-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:54666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPDA9-0004N0-6W; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tvcJb1zsLz3hhtg; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:53:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tvcJb1R99zvkV8; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:53:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDmoGjPD94pR; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:53:18 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: BwGqK54PRTXYdJIlHLj6lz4/2BHmi6SkmnN1MQm3QxLrf2rj3bV85IiEue5xOwAl Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-26-238.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.26.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:53:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A90772C46FB; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:53:17 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Sign my PETITION. In-Reply-To: <83wpe9cpyc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:38:19 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211137 Archived-At: On Jan 05 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Strangely, whether I set xpg_echo or not, the current autogen.sh > produces the same nt/gnulib.mk, although the effect on 'echo' is as > you indicate above. So why doesn't that option have effect here? Because you are relying on unspecified behaviour of the sed script. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."