From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master adfb6f1: Continue to fix bug#25607 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:45:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87efyzyvpe.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20170215184246.30452.62655@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170215184247.DC51023357@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <8e6b7990-3424-6780-ddc7-8ae36cff06d0@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487195160 24969 195.159.176.226 (15 Feb 2017 21:46:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:46:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 22:45:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ce7OZ-0005qA-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:45:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ce7Oe-0006sc-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:45:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ce7OW-0006sM-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ce7OT-00045N-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ce7OS-00044H-6e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.197.211.122]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaaVn-1bxvxe1SHf-00mOZz; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:45:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8e6b7990-3424-6780-ddc7-8ae36cff06d0@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:41:01 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WcQuLPJ2K67pIWE5p5xMMx/fnSRUqZkHq/tCUmdHlT2oJtNP17w sidsFlw1M96gEy9YpRUGaWbHBcDU2YEwTkBn7Rvp6pMql7KqM8BHHKzLbVMeQRoaSaoKZye 1NJMlhUnW2QNqUZGQq/DgMqkyw2Hm/zWTowKDRYivixn8inh7Fl+FP5Mzb+5gjRoV+80NmM F1yU2JoBUffZUETR0+rng== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/7wWkJRmbuY=:27PodK6ouc712SzjCBQmTS KSNenhoHZbYFy5+y7n5Ry7xEKp5pd+NZuNCYemK9WojYE/OZe+JwpBRku87aw1tqAXk3N6xOV 09+XdNgk+UCgFWlMQf6xno9+2/YpoBN4Nxb1Ow0ItCbTZ+oF1j0f7E+Gw8fWCBoOFkukawijH PFEcji3tAgvs/I5AH7ztfPUT/qPWjD/W0m47foIheZKe2RCgAomHQi0IyH92qY94EgLuI6nSL BBGxQyzJotaUqb+kZl9So27ZseSgjg1DzmDGGmHeKl338l0X9cmMfhh3He4STZdOXj378lWlq /zyChtYWnmTANUtbBKFoA87tToi7vEBTV4hA6Hh70UegmdkDg3eBi23jjmqmEFWirr/JfMqO/ ODJANoCUbNNUIsICVpFpiyX6cjzft1xk5cVLsmEqcdByozDHxoDdPvvTH+KBcCisWRd3xH6qF rnReO82ydvSkP+awYHmtd1/IHqcpslr04KK6hCMsLsVkLkFFaCZoNjG8K3pYTXpuruXMsvMF6 FNh58pxFzTrbGDQmLhg48f2X9lKM/XXCjH0RsKMxUSetIws4EjE7sSyBZJ+E2wTKmurvGfqrD uOOrHL/9N4R9zOq/bJiRBx5iFuvpOCxjtwYGuTJguoAw3W2PFiERzHrMaWo9FvZnUYIlHHZvx lThnyvIhr+VhVrlyOpRI0IJ+5/KXfjJ0lCmjkG26x/kl34mycha4SmsJpAoOegln/ZxMEdVFH vpFcgaKRDdJmSAaV/ZbtZHXu5mojXShLssRw0wwCjc4mK0Lk7Yh7vgyT3u6VHOwdAaVJAbkO X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212411 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > The removal of the other non-essential binding looks more dubious to me. This was inside `ido-file-name-all-completions-1'. According to the traces I've collected, this function is always called inside `ido-read-internal', which has already bound `non-essential' to t. And my (limited, I'm not an ido user) tests haven't shown any regression. Best regards, Michael.