From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of emacs-25 branch Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 22:38:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87efvi9c8d.fsf@petton.fr> References: <83mvalc483.fsf@gnu.org> <83fugdbfzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvakppt2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2zwa759.fsf@gnu.org> <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495399156 29853 195.159.176.226 (21 May 2017 20:39:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 20:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 21 22:39:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCXdA-0007gQ-Ab for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 22:39:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCXdF-0003CL-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 16:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCXcu-00035p-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 16:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCXct-000344-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 16:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:52333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCXcp-00032W-B3; Sun, 21 May 2017 16:38:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1495399127; bh=UDr1lSDjFPtddaRlIJRCHVNZ+rpsGiTGq0Kqv/acW8Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IQA3UJU8YRGl4VDENFAV030OwoSu3GweMdZFrYW/ZKgPnbprhyZBlGS/2Tmwzz/qTs98Rf5BQnvmmoioUOfjanlFQzXcTUtAW/Odc7d1kCKa2feSOrOi+R+qOD3oRFhwu+ffDERXUVP50zHpl1tpdyj7gTQQyvnPrJTc5acxsuI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215067 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: > OK, thanks. I kinda agree. But meanwhile we had this nasty bug#26952 > reported against Emacs 25.2, so I'd like first to see if we can have > an emergency Emacs 25.3 release. I can make a release if you want (I guess we'll need to go through a few release candidates?). Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZIfrSAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQzMAIAMyvtBKLBpOPfqOQBmAguzXH 5Ea0ekona9SrjxkV1o5XP/SaSF/tYzSDgaRWYHVJzsYPm0V0kglWLhUmD0E/xeto zD6TdbDmCtQtj8G8+yOzKqImhBZaWtARJW6Th5Pkrx/c/OPRR7VdkoapRMTTn/sg CFMk5WCflokHw52sj1R7AKewfjfSki8EHu9qcvT6cB3/g9xxmJnU04Ux7H/RIRcm YelG6o32JmuDCRrsDFROLrWFQAAzKNWoAyBSNMJ+QW1PmrXguzNfVevwEPsdA1TT e+cgjpD0u6IUjD+GYn9bOacm17wA7lzNiun/foMM9RnW0lPU3FDPMDmRYSkMkwg= =ejmu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--