From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31737: 26.1.50; Gnus does not use mailutils movemail Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:08:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87efha93t6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sh5zk9br.fsf@gmail.com> <8736xzvgrg.fsf@yandex.com> <87o9gnk7vb.fsf@gmail.com> <831sdhuwc1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvqdjmid.fsf@gmail.com> <83sh5xtaa5.fsf@gnu.org> <87602tjesm.fsf@gmail.com> <83muw5t78t.fsf@gnu.org> <871sddk9su.fsf@gmail.com> <83lgblqrir.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh5thu73.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2lcpwk3.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9gg7cue.fsf@yandex.com> <83lgbkoynn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528898892 8798 195.159.176.226 (13 Jun 2018 14:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Colin Baxter , 31737@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 13 16:08:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6RT-0002CD-GN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:08:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6Ta-0002tK-M9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6TO-0002nI-Fw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6TK-0006Gl-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6TK-0006GQ-Gl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6TK-0006Ul-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31737-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31737.152889895024903 (code B ref 31737); Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2018 14:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6SR-0006TX-0u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:40646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6SL-0006T0-PE for 31737@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n5-v6so5667390wmc.5 for <31737@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PFji7v9BuN0cVIbKYEf3Z9rG2l3tsEYJvJIGPaQO90U=; b=a7k/Z3lVOP8tF/D4PBNsSm041EUDkeqqoNSESPvxkV06nvyOqe2D305FDjRjvs2fV3 S4JySN0Y0nBAXfpL81QBBjhnYHmOXh1Ae6asrsv+/bqbYXekG8pwOH0hvS4iZMG3avWx EtjVDSz6JxDyZw5UCnINJGxrnezEJu7eJM8D8sHix+T7lSRkbtusY37YKZAZHiJ8zWMC t0dPT+dNWfRE3VqYG7wvzVsr770KGskBBNAMfNJXoi8xfHhZDmwe+nlv82hn3MWyif5J 9b4Ct5nKF9tmu50pZlOzP6dMk8TnveFQWfFDFKvd+y5hD9oML2Sle9r+zyyRJwlHlf6z ojOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PFji7v9BuN0cVIbKYEf3Z9rG2l3tsEYJvJIGPaQO90U=; b=QHadBcY8QpQ+G04QJqiFTAYTEwczAbXBXSSXhnE1Uqgz4mHDiiXLfjrTdbp53hbEI7 fzkmrxXNcMSHPPewyGQ+U78zcP9oGsSEDAXDjkEvca460L7xEcpGoXHBSFiFezUsyMvk FcsfzrbrujwTviqbX8X5PI8vS7SL11pzIe37rvEaJD0mDQar3wl2jg56fcBsKwwMvbdJ k2M2jb+Njalr+YCCtfQmzAXmd+zkICxVk5ciuMXP2axBNUBSLaUuXPvdQ0+TJ0Hdx6uS yYAk6HR3zV5UrgiqioCCAquaebsdbVwtJlm2yzhR4KrMSPG8AK/B9qvwSqRVee+JN+PL fNRg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3qeR6pe2XkgRc2yjSDlxnjoGdnuUrrX49TGGmfp4qf5VQwi1wX NuDoiZWiEAyhI7otGZNZwz/4dVlF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJltLCmoTmGvsDFkx6TuKUyyPtG/v8CbfiEEs3MKsdd9CEyxNASE6o49aNmEY7u8JVbPPhMxg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc10:: with SMTP id h16-v6mr3367002wmb.155.1528898935582; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17-v6sm4150407wrr.7.2018.06.13.07.08.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:24:46 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147369 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> As to whether Gnus should also use that option -- I think it should, >> because the code in mail-source.el which invokes movemail is an almost >> exact copy of its sibling in rmail.el. It's quite possible that Gnus >> simply uses some old version of what's in Rmail. (In particular, >> rmail.el already does what I suggested to do in order to invoke >> movemail from mailutils in preference to the version which comes with >> Emacs.) >> >> So I'm CC'ing Lars in the hope that he will decide what to do with >> these two issues. > > I don't think that mail-source needs that --emacs switch -- it never > has, I think? But from what you say, it probably doesn't hurt... mail-source will only ever have used Mailutils movemail for those people who had it installed *and* were aware that mail-source-movemail-program needed specifying, so I suspect the sample we=CA=BCre talking about is small. Eli, were you thinking that mail-source should duplicate the movemail detection logic in rmail? Or should it just assume Mailutils movemail and pass '--emacs'? Robert