From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32747: 26; `C-M-w M-w' with non-nil `mouse-drag-copy-region', if selected with mouse Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:16:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87efdnq0g9.fsf@gmail.com> References: >>>>> <83tvmlew2a.fsf@gnu.org>>>>>> <932a1915-c043-4708-9f16-dc0ee8fafdb3@default>>>>> <83pnx9een5.fsf@gnu.org>>>>> <01b0f0c4-e3b8-440f-a739-5995ca4ff615@default>>>> <83o9cte392.fsf@gnu.org>>>> <9136cccc-7e97-4a74-89a9-00eccab73c32@default>>> <4394ff48-2444-4a9b-b635-e96e66a30cba@default>>> <83a7obexed.fsf@gnu.org>>> <1254fccb-35ae-4c51-8471-e01844f64517@default>> <834lejevn7.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537481718 21755 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2018 22:15:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:15:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32747@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 21 00:15:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g37E9-0005Wr-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:15:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52982 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g37GG-0002cg-8U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g37Fz-0002bB-6B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g37Fu-0004G6-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g37Fu-0004Fw-BT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g37Ft-0004g1-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32747.153748179217932 (code B ref 32747); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2018 22:16:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g37FQ-0004f4-FJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com ([209.85.166.52]:44324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g37FO-0004en-5I; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id u12-v6so5033762ioc.11; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=EcPguuEDYwHBKctUD/zFiq1wXcy3Rseo8kgl2pGiWlA=; b=jfMGJeM+D+ytNZvH3JSY2xOk492dPDPkXD70rM83PNcTnclZYB0/Jts8/9jqfHlQSn 377g9nNkUhBEyO4mZl5hqUsi3k5uaE7ygf2oRSWQrnRjI2hFC06TDZAHrymHpQJnt34F zNnJS+uWLpXo1VVwMmFdidtrpAf/1YuYCPpZ/KFC2iQagPOSPsjyoct+8PpE98BqWOb8 cM9XxCVYqvx7D9SfmHSrl+nsDCmQqp2BujjVQZ+Jbl7OwkZqJX2YaCtzXwDl91U0MLOs UkYNtSrMgB1oyiXC0ICg5gWSRt/aYLuOL0X08qmnnNkqRBgENftpSc/cE1bFx8oyXioL eeoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=EcPguuEDYwHBKctUD/zFiq1wXcy3Rseo8kgl2pGiWlA=; b=GXHZxlWxMlS4s2Kp9FWaKv5Xh41EyyrczOOExCtIee7+3lf3VXNbEqAyq0N5Y5kDsp qW+nepG/oIXeMdVmfqWcHK6bvlbkK7gFShQgnryye4dPii/eLTNFXxTr2XM0TCsCBnM8 EIhbTwz7Kdb+QztfGfChAPnqRcG8kgmQvcbFWcxOaKiuxUgk+lVctQQXedUnVf3rgOti 13fcODOZYdgA2jmY/DXqKavKaoVpiZTE5pl/Y03RhadfLr4RxOunz40Mn1treng/5BgI AwwTFa0DA+BeAlGFL22t2eggRBYq5eYYF7p7NfAQEwDewz3Rbu2HlAE0Od5m4p7xc4NP x+dw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BMt8fMYu3WjIoboNQlm5b+TPJABdX6tdf807+EZwsgnAGRhnSD kayaVl+vkaTKLIq887TO7SPq7vFi X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYkRp/OEGo0Sva8PERZJIxGqiaf6FbvoDI/31OdqdMY/+/j9uFNrZMCmDaerlnQHmV3NnOCGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:994c:: with SMTP id b73-v6mr34555510ioe.14.1537481784605; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g198-v6sm1331717itg.4.2018.09.20.15.16.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:59:08 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150499 Archived-At: retitle 32747 Be able to append mouse selections at the head of `kill-ring' (e.g, with C-M-w) quit >> > > I don't understand why you address this to me although it's clear that >> > > I didn't retitle this bug. >> > >> > I replied to the last msg I got from this thread; sorry. >> >> In which I said nothing about retitling. So in what sense is this a >> "reply"? > > Didn't know how to reply to the control action of retitling. > Again, sorry for bothering you. Welp, I guess the lesson here is to always send the retitling action to the bug thread in addition to control. I'll remember for next time.