From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34920: 27.0.50; Poor eww rendering of SourceHut file "trees" Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:32:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87ef52up57.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87zhpojgs4.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="38797"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 34920@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 13 21:35:37 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGjX-0009w5-4C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:35:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGjW-0000QT-4Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:35:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGh5-0007MH-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGh4-0002Vn-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGh4-0002Vh-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGh3-00052k-QP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34920 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34920-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34920.155777593518469 (code B ref 34920); Mon, 13 May 2019 19:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2019 19:32:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGgJ-0004nb-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGgH-0004lX-Be for 34920@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [12.41.144.226] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGgA-0000x2-Ph; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:32:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:24:54 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159201 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > That's a possibility, but like I said, shr supports such a minimal > subset of CSS that you're not going to see much, if any, difference. > > And there's no way to determine what CSS files are going to contain the > stuff we support, so you'd have to fetch and parse them all. Anyway, making shr being ACID compliant (or something along those lines) is, I think, beyond the scope of a bug report -- if shr is going to render HTML according to the CSS specs, it's a monumental project (and is, I believe) make shr so slow that you can't use it, anyway. So I'm closing this bug report. :-/ -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no