From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33005: 27.0.50; Data loss with Gnus registry Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:32:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87eezbkc0m.fsf@web.de> References: <871s8yvsrq.fsf@web.de> <87in29x33z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2gxygox.fsf@web.de> <87efcxwzr2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ldtlcks.fsf@web.de> <87ftxdl7w1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878t33cjf2.fsf@web.de> <87o8za4gbl.fsf@web.de> <87mueuicys.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d0fgnik0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87v9srzm9g.fsf@web.de> <87ftjvz045.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv8ajd6d.fsf@web.de> <87lftlsr90.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877e55xcj6.fsf@web.de> <87a7a0pu5u.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="211392"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33005@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 17 10:33:56 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1EJ-000ssP-2o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:33:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1EH-0003Ty-EI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DU-0003TJ-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DT-00014X-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DT-00014S-90 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DS-0003Bs-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33005.157130117612252 (code B ref 33005); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2019 08:32:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DM-0003BU-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:52413) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL1DI-0003BH-Vf for 33005@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 04:32:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571301155; bh=IBdG3gLJBEiR2TnCAAonr5r2uI3DUYydAwcRBHVzP0U=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lPDu15MKveSvTRiMnQBMFZutZjaUlCEfAZfD+5iyuVndS9AjGANDWoUP0AYiIGHMh +RTWh5bdSi/5LtoVi+k6Dk4VVxci+hZzXM/IOri4BWeVuFayyhXaRW8TMdD2UbWJyt Lii2cKA2aLhABTRFczRNpZTcDxCTcXTcdi7O53EU= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUnUe-1iXAq71o32-00YB9a; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:32:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a7a0pu5u.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:49:33 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NdR6B7kMPbiHIYFYGGi6jFWmebyGrgvNz8NoiMfOYz+RB4UXArY Jz7zdp4dbwe4II/Cz/wyklBrZ70CJU/Cmkj4gdo7gKSKoU97/1vHRYAw7jGfWWqLS25MVWS QbdO1BiqzBY1kFegBfnhfIfEqCaUsGKx+UpJ2dKA34dhjacn0HKKXprBHIDvhlRWecDp5c/ pXDqwyJb0vRq401zxa1Tg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WKQ2Elo4l8w=:dvdWUhqiRg1o3dO0wqvT99 nwe4Nc2SZktw2lTB4dVZ2d8cdy3EEE10d1NATDnKZIHuCVHr+Lc8wCWL/qBK6dWdT8SlNIiYS LhIOTUQOr/e9SFFdu1lMibjBGELhkchu5By2475lrtnvUkLR8/WNjOMMUWiDYK29FffnU4o72 Trg1KzCKfestadqCetjt9b5Pdk4Mj1c0UsPEFC4eZdNKl5tGUPWSm8t7m2nCs5ZhV2gAPyfsh +uGv03GDr6lB7LAdnvmPd38iotJk/jkV18ivaYRwUJYghvmaGUDeJM4bGKSSMg82f5b7j0mLA nmhqilxyYtByvPsdVV8UqO6HEbaz7+FObqWfERWAcxWfsHUAE5/ir9Na2eWfeWOvZQRuMs/q/ 0JiUUo04NHMHWA3mATYDvrrFF0B0jn1NrQdOgyIN+wvDBzUe57sIGh617AdqfcKWYsCzMmqiY VpyP4nHShpbkf3Gtz9Pv0MJvIcLNQhEt1tSD9dY70RKTjMzewybYiYsxUMYp9zuaYx4zuEzFN 0F3G4IFRUHKi686H4dE/CWLF9oEd2aRI3H2Xw4dSIYpITid6FbvnCxMel06ZMfmqrOUhrdcfh oLc56vkUGwKQQ/1tJCTvNjlih3M+crlyJoCV9+FQKTgnGtNFvzLLPUSJrDSGthcfZ1eI5eTAa JEM8Dv39oB6Ux9C8eICaM0wOL25I8/0YJq33GzWHpCwHvCZmVLd0Z45h+BY+ZOZvEsmODGHkP 3/OU/ZZka/MgUqiaJ8ZBHN6fRxSyDYDdRG7EDEZ8OmaFIEwte/9K1+03vznYowSlSM203BIO X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169543 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Whoa, definitely not, and that's not how it's supposed to work. I wonder > what could cause that... Do you have > `gnus-summary-display-while-building' set to anything? No. > Oh, I remember you've got some advice on message limiting? I forget > what, exactly. Maybe try disabling that and see if it has anything to do > with it? I currently have no such advices enabled afaict. How can I debug this - where is the old article line supposed to be removed? I see that line duplication happens in `gnus-summary-update-article', but it's quite complex. Thanks, Michael.