From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38796: 26.3; `view-lossage': Use a variable for the lossage limit Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:24:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87eenygyrx.fsf@gnus.org> References: <43aac56d-ecf1-44ed-9be1-ffb8e5f8a7ce@default> <83zhfbm448.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh8pij6e.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <83v9jc3o3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo3qj1s6.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , 38796@debbugs.gnu.org, uyennhi.qm@gmail.com To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 22 23:26:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9b1e-0003aB-P3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:26:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41134 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9b1d-0003bw-P1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9b0Y-0002iW-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9b0Y-0003Fz-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9b0Y-0000X8-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38796 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38796-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38796.15981314571996 (code B ref 38796); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38796) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2020 21:24:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9azp-0000W7-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9azo-0000Vw-3I for 38796@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:24:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Cc5Mi39a9v9VVwt5RcVYN9yKHMDfPnTnnvs7BTMTcKA=; b=t8lDLzr92RtGosGrsNEa8zjxWX Xr79l7zg19eRY74iuWR+Tjoy/UrbMbJgGLl+QScYjuCPyVZWxfSj42d+p3uAqCuQPsBDqdR9CQIC5 XBb2j6eV8qmckJjPr1eUQ33UiioTh8R2tbVuhduEEZm57I5yXSLa2tvffQIXZwB/ESns=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9azc-00080c-2f; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 23:24:09 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Tangerine Dream's _Zeit (1)_: "Origin of Supernatural Probabilities" In-Reply-To: <87wo3qj1s6.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> (Tino Calancha's message of "Sun, 28 Jun 2020 23:52:57 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186003 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: >> I agree that disabling should not necessarily be implemented by >> "abusing" the max-lossage setting. > Yeah, it was appealing to me at first look: the code was offering > another feature for free! > After your comments I rethink about it and become less excited: it > always posible that we might be hit back in other parts of the code > if they assume a 'sensible large enough' value. I thought it sounded quite natural to use the same mechanism to switch lossage logging off. `(update-lossage-size 0)' seems like a natural thing to do to have no lossage. > Users can still safely modify the lossage limit with the > command `update-lossage-size'. For convenience, add > a function `lossage-size' to return the current limit. Hm... other functions use the convention of having a zero-parameter function return the data, and having a parameter to set it. So (lossage-size 500) could set it and (lossage-size) could return the current size? Anyway, it doesn't look like you've merged the branch? I think everybody was in favour of adding this feature. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no