Re: ELPA -- making individual packages

[Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>]

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Benjamin Riefenstahl <b.riefenstahl@turtle-trading.net> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> I don't think `make` can do exactly that, but there's no doubt that we
>>> should be able to provide a way to build just a particular package
>>> (maybe the target would have to be called something else than just
>>> `gnorb`, e.g. `compile-gnorb`).  It's probably not that hard.
>>
>> Right, in GNU make I have done it like this before:
>>
>>   compile-%:
>>       echo Making package $* ...
>>       [commands to make the package]
>>
>>   test-%:
>>       echo Testing package $* ...
>>       [commands to test the package]
>
> Well, this is as far as I've been able to get:
>
> .PHONY:
> compile-%:
> 	@if [ -d "$(CURDIR)/packages/$*" ]; then		      \
> 	  $(MAKE) -C "$(CURDIR)/packages/$*" "*.elc";                 \
> 	else							      \
> 	  echo "No such package: $*";                         	      \
> 	fi;

Off-list someone sent me this:

define RULE-pkg
$(notdir $(1)): $(filter $(1)/%, $(elcs))
endef

$(foreach pkg, $(pkgs), $(eval $(call RULE-pkg, $(pkg))))

Which seems to work! Called with the bare package name. One weird thing,
though, is that for each file being compiled I get:

Unable to activate package ‘relint’.
Required package ‘xr-1.19’ is unavailable
Unable to activate package ‘exwm’.
Required package ‘xelb-0.18’ is unavailable
Unable to activate package ‘ebdb-i18n-chn’.
Required package ‘pyim-1.6.0’ is unavailable
Unable to activate package ‘counsel’.
Required package ‘swiper-0.13.1’ is unavailable

Which is odd since the package I'm compiling doesn't have anything to do
with those packages.

But, closer to success.