From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59293: 28.1.90; Erroneous footnote link in Org info manual Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 01:22:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87edu3elrf.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="418"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 59293@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 02:23:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ov799-000AOl-9W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:23:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov78q-0004xv-W1; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov78o-0004xc-Mg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov78o-0001tx-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ov78n-0002Ps-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 01:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 59293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16685617229204 (code B ref -1); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 01:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2022 01:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ov77q-0002OO-Cx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ov77h-0002Ns-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:22:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov77h-0004ho-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov77e-0001U7-7C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB72240026 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:21:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668561707; bh=DA/d8WXNorkwpLJfjwbuorD2L8229D3x8qMPWBrkQ8E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=CnxOT1afVZYZ1cPnmCJnbNXvE425Kg8o+tI+Wn+TCY6q2879wGVD/6NXBzUVdaNqy SuM+20kgw8E+XS9VY1xlm5wxXBwU8U2coqxjklTD9fXl0nw+Fw0UnYl0qDbM7RcCTA nmuZ7AHCCd0cW3qOGGqbpsGn7prAd3qMst7AillqPGeULrYdW/rUkpfdUizTu0M5vn eChxk8rBcbvtsyC+xKPDT+l6wMb2BBWVHq5vKGBQdtYjSiHTRR/2s+bVYPKxbJRSJs 9vskPJb5FcTcIfqljvAGtyUkLjboT/gdHW/fOmD42a+pTzppeADFfN8oUJVgwN66Hq uNJUv8k+QyBAQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NBld65V2mz6tmB for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:21:46 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:247982 Archived-At: Hi, I am forwarding this from Org mailing list discussion about Org manual. https://orgmode.org/list/87pmdqfao4.fsf@localhost In 16.5 Evaluating Code Blocks section of Org info manual, there is an example code block #+NAME: random #+BEGIN_SRC R :cache yes runif(1) #+END_SRC This code block is represented like the following in the texinfo Org manual source: @example #+NAME: random #+BEGIN_SRC R :cache yes runif(1) #+END_SRC ... @end example Note the (1). It is unexpectedly shown as a footnote reference and one can click on (1). This only happens in the info manual. Not in html. I have checked https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040example.html and I do not see anything wrong in the above texinfo source. I am also not an expert in texinfo. Could someone more experienced with texinfo check if the observed is something to be fixed on Org side, on Texinfo side, or maybe on Info-mode side? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at