Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:

> Hi there!
>
> Attached is a patch that enables transpose-sexps for tree-sitter enabled
> modes.
>
> This function will swap the node _before_ node-at-point with the node
> _after_, so it would do something like:
>
>        foo a|nd bar => bar and foo|
>
> or
>        foo(a + 4,| y + c * b, b, d); => foo(y + c * b, a + 4|, b, d);
>
> It will _not_ try to swap things that are not siblings.  I think that
> makes sense in the case of non-lisp languages, since _most_ places you
> can transpose-sexps you will end up with broken code.
>

from 'transpose-subr-1':

  (if (> (cdr pos1) (car pos2)) (error "Don't have two things to
  transpose"))

I added this hack into the function in the patch, but I think that
triggering an error is too much.

    ;; Hack to trigger the error message in `transpose-subr-1' when we
    ;; don't have siblings to swap.
    (list (cons 0 1) (cons 0 1))))

I guess I could just follow suit in my function and do like in the
following patch:

Theo