Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

gerard.vermeulen@posteo.net writes:

>> I'd appreciate if other ob-lisp users could test the patch with both 
>> SLY
>> and SLIME.
>> 
>> I have no comments on the Elisp part of the patch.
>
> I have a few additional remarks:
>
> The patch is against main only because it overlaps a region where bugfix
> and main diverged.  I am willing to provide a similar patch against 
> main.

I do not think that we in a hurry to put this onto bugfix.
Bugfix is just for trivial and critical fixes.
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#release-types

Writing the whole extra alternative patch is probably too much to bother.

> I hope that my mail reaches David (CC-ed dto@gnu.org  taken from the
> file header), but my previous message bounced (non-existent address).

I am CCing his alternative (AFAIK) email.
David, if you are still interested to deal with ob-lisp, we can update
the email.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>