From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62524: Support displaying all package maintainers Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 16:50:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87edoyjsc6.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <20230329153214.752-1-jonas@bernoul.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 62524@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 05 16:51:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4Tl-0000fA-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 16:51:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TZ-0007kc-Di; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TX-0007kS-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TW-0005w5-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TW-00060I-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20230329153214.752-1-jonas@bernoul.li> Resent-From: Jonas Bernoulli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62524 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 62524-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62524.168070625323014 (code B ref 62524); Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62524) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2023 14:50:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TM-0005z5-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:41238) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pk4TL-0005yi-6p for 62524@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 10:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E826B1636F for <62524@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:50:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=sel2011a; t= 1680706249; bh=vuh/5QdF0Ko6aYeGx5hK8W6Oi12a3saCBWInVqRxLYc=; b=P enE1qDjel39QsxJLfai2Zx+2p33Zj8YD5rcXdDOQH5mKhNcQr5EE6RbsMdo0DsCB AfkfKF2rx1Nt+2EzlHI0cyhEATb+j4A65UgQWC5Wm9EsMcci0px4qtZZnl6+9ASg E4d7NpLiwiUQIZB2YNklMQfO7oPNhC+uxdOCN7SRMU= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id wn_sAvtZcHxm for <62524@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADA981626C for <62524@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 16:50:49 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259270 Archived-At: [ I am re-sending this message because the MDS refused to deliver the previous iteration. Stefan, your reply contained a header "Cc: ??@debbugs.gnu.org". ] Stefan Monnier writes: >> Even once all ELPAs have been updated to include `:maintainers', they >> have to continue to also include `:maintainer', for the benefit of >> older versions of this function / package.el / Emacs. > > We could drop `:maintainer` within a few years, tho: this info is not > super-important and it would impact only users of older Emacsen. That's the plan. >> To avoid this duplication, `package' would have to be distributed on >> GNU ELPA as a "core" package. > > That still wouldn't help those users who didn't upgrade their built-in > `package.el`. I hope that we can eventually not only make Package available on GNU Elpa, but also get users of older Emacs releases to update to that version, see 87tty24ap2.fsf@bernoul.li > Other than that: OK with me. So should I go ahead and install this now (on master, I assume)? Once that is done, I'll update the elpa-admin equivalent for Melpa. I plan to only include :maintainers in archive-contents if there actually are multiple maintainers. That way there is less duplicated data, and I recommend you do the same in elpa-admin. Oh, and the comment you added to package-buffer-info in 4e6f98cd505ed56 is wrong; shall I just replace "single string" with "single cons-cell"? Cheers, Jonas